![]()
I hope it's enough to show that i'm not making anything up here. I know people should be inherently skeptical here, so, i'll do my best to provide you with as much in the line of details as I can remember. Although i've tried recently to contact them to ask them privately (as a fellow Redditor suggested) with no luck.Īnyway, back to our charming childhood story. Secondly, the person who I believe did it, J, has moderate to severe autism, and, at least at the time, was being cared for by his brother, who we'll call "K". The FCC may still want to have a little talk with at least one of the two brothers, who we'll call "J", the one who I believe was behind it. There are a couple reasons, ones that I think most fair-minded people would agree with.įirst, there's the obvious. Max headroom broadcast signal intrusion news full#I still remember what their full names are, but I don't think it's a good idea to share them publically. This is the point in the story where you folks aren't going to be happy with me. In most cases, I only knew them by their handle, but a few I knew by name. ![]() Most of them were just casual acquaintances. In any event, I spent countless hours/nights over the ensuing years hanging out with them on local BBS'es and dial-up chat systems, and the occasional in-person get together. (This was suburban Chicago, from about 1985 until 1993 or so.) They were much older than me (high school and college age), but they put up with me as sort of a novelty I guess.They liked the fact I looked up to them as quasi-role models, at least. When I was in my early teens, a number of my friends were into the local phreaking/hacking scene. What I know about all of it in a nutshell: We've decided to leave the story here for those who have an interest in reading the case background. PLEASE READ: After 4 years, I'm happy to say that the two individuals mentioned in the article, J and K, have been formally excluded as suspects. Follow us on Twitter or Like us on Facebook!įacebook Twitter Instagram Calendar Please check out our Rules and FAQs.Email us at Step-by-step guide to doing an AMA. ![]() See more on our comment removals policy here.Attempting to bypass this rule by adding a ? to a non question will result in a permanent ban.All initial responses to posters must contain a properly punctuated question.Requests should be posted in /r/IAmARequests.See here for tips concerning proof and examples.If it must remain confidential, you can submit proof on our website so we can verify you and your claims. Proof should be included in the text of the post when you start your AMA.Explanation and examples of this rule can be found here.Something uncommon that plays a central role in your life, or.The incident made national headlines and the people responsible have never been identified.Submit an AMA Request an AMA Please check out our Rules and FAQs Max headroom broadcast signal intrusion news serial#The first incident took place for 25 seconds during the sportscast on the 9:00 PM news on WGN-TV Channel 9, and the second, two hours later, after 11:00 PM on PBS related WTTW Channel 11 for about 90 seconds during a broadcast of an episode of the Doctor Who serial Horror of Fang Rock. The incident happened two times within a course of three hours. A homemade Max Headroom background rocked back and forth in the background. Two Chicago television stations, WGN-TV and WTTW, had their broadcast signals hijacked by an unknown person wearing a Max Headroom mask and sunglasses. video of the event video of the WTTW signal intrusion ![]() It is an example of what is known in the television business as broadcast signal intrusion. ![]() It involved at least three unknown people. The Max Headroom broadcast signal intrusion was a television signal hijacking that happened in Chicago, Illinois, United States, on the evening of November 22, 1987. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |